T. S. Eliot starts his poem The Waste Land with the words “April
is the cruellest month.” April 2013
will undoubtedly be the cruellest month for many of our fellow citizens who are
to be hit by a vicious one-two-three combination. They will be struck with deep
welfare cuts and then by the withdrawal of access to the law, as legal aid is
cut, and finally they will be denied even advice as the budget for that too is
slashed.
These are the poorest and the most vulnerable in
our society. Many are disabled. Many are children. They are all effectively voiceless.
A few Establishment voices have been raised on
behalf of the voiceless. It is
heartening that the new Archbishop of Canterbury seems determined to speak out,
as did his predecessor. Four Churches
have issued a joint statement condemning the “unjust welfare cuts targeting society’s most vulnerable”. The most
senior judge in the land, Lord Neuberger, has warned that the cuts in legal aid
go too far and even risk people taking the law into their own hands.
The poor and vulnerable are being bullied. There
are few sights more disgusting than seeing the rich, powerful and comfortable
bullying the weak.
The Tories have prepared the ground, of course.
Their narrative is that these people are being knocked about because either a)
they deserve it as they are cheating and idling scroungers or b) it is being
done for their own good to prod them off welfare into work or c) the country
needs harsh measures to deal with the deficit.
The Tories are smearing the weak and vulnerable by
use of half-truths and quarter-truths and cynical stereotyping. They ignore the fact that most people on
benefits are working and, indeed, many of those on low wages are working as
hard as anyone. They ignore the fact that many are simply unable to work - let
alone to “strive” - such as many of the disabled and all the children. They
ignore the fact that in much of the country there are no jobs available.
In the same cruel month of April 2013 that the
weakest and poorest are to be plunged into deeper suffering, the strongest and
richest are to be given a windfall as the top rate of tax is cut. The change
will mean that 13,000 millionaires will be over £100,000 richer each and every
year. One of the beneficiaries will be
the aptly named Barclays banker, Rich Ricci.
He was given a £17.6 million bonus last month and will now gain far more
than £100,000 annually as a result of the Tory tax cut. A pound in Ricci’s
pocket is one less for the deficit reduction which the Tories cite to justify
taking money from the poor.
How do the Tories get away with it? They couldn’t
do it without the press. Even in the internet age, the press still has immense
power over public opinion. Our so-called “free press” – for the most part owned
by billionaires, edited by millionaires and with commentators on six figure
salaries – has constantly pumped out the Tory’s noxious narrative of the
deserving rich and the undeserving poor.
The economist J K Galbraith once observed: -"The modern conservative is engaged in
one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy: that is, the search for a
superior moral justification for selfishness." I am sure that Rich Ricci believes he is
morally justified to his six figure annual windfall from the Tory tax cut. He
can rely on Fleet Street’s finest to be trenchant and fearless in their
agreement.
Most readers of the British press never learn the
truth about how those at the bottom of our society are treated. Sadly, many would ignore the truth even if
confronted with it. This is due in part
to the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance - the deeply unsettling and
uncomfortable feeling that people experience when something forces them to
question their pre-existing beliefs.
People will usually do anything to avoid it.
Perhaps in April or in the following months, there
will be a Milly Dowler moment. Perhaps something so awful will happen to
someone as a result of Tory policy for the poor and vulnerable that the Tories
and the press will lose control of the narrative. Perhaps, finally, millions of Britons will ask
how such events could be allowed to happen in our country in 2013.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Mr. Tom London, I am an admiring follower of your articles which I always find informative and stimulating, and often with perspectives which I would not have thought of myself. I hope that when you have time you will post a good selection of your previous articles in the archive section. MM
ReplyDelete