David Cameron has attacked Russia for pledging to
use its UN veto against limited military action against Syria. However, a
significant reason for the Russian position is that they are convinced that Cameron himself, together with Barack Obama and
Nicolas Sarkozy, deceived them at the UN two years ago over Libya.
In March 2011, the US, Britain and France sought a
resolution at the UN to authorise NATO intervention against Colonel Gaddafi’s
regime. They justified such an intervention as a purely humanitarian response
to the threat that Gaddafi would carry out a Srebrenica-style massacre in Benghazi.
The final UN resolution authorised member states to: -
“…take all
necessary measures ...to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under
threat of attack in Libya…while excluding a foreign occupation force of any
form on any part of Libyan territory.”
The US, UK and France persuaded Russia and China not to use
their vetoes on the grounds that the Resolution only authorised a limited
humanitarian intervention, such as a no-fly zone and limited airstrikes against
Gaddafi’s forces threatening Benghazi. The same argument was used to persuade
India, Germany and Brazil also to abstain.
However, it very soon became clear that the Western
powers intended to use their overwhelming airpower to support one side in a
civil war and to bring about regime change. They argued that this was allowed
under the UN Resolution by stretching the meaning of the words “all necessary measures”
far beyond what Russia and China had understood them to mean when they were
persuaded to abstain.
The highly respected defence think-tank the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) has commented that the “Resolution was contorted out of
all recognition from the protection of civilians to, in effect, outright regime
change.”
Vladimir Putin has denounced the US, British and French
action as "a crude violation of the UN Resolution" and “a complete scandal and a complete affront to the international
community.” The fact that Putin himself is known
for his brutal methods and lack of respect for human rights should not change the
force of his criticism.
In 2012, RUSI published a report on the British
involvement in Libyan conflict. The
title itself was telling, "Short War, Long Shadow." RUSI noted that the way the
Western powers behaved over the Resolution “left a sour taste in the mouths of
powers like China, Russia and India…”
In the report RUSI worried that a legacy of the Libya conflict
would be that China and Russia would presume that “the model in future was
actually regime change rather than the protection of civilians and so would use
their vetoes more frequently.”
In 2013, the US and France are once again talking of
launching a “limited” attack. It is not surprising that some countries do not
trust them not to misuse any limited authorisation to go far wider, as they did
in Libya. It was at the very least naïve
to think that the West could be seen to trick Russia and China and others and that there
would not be any consequences.
No comments:
Post a Comment